All About Labor History And Its Historical Interpretation

focused on the experiences and perspectives of the working class during the Industrial Revolution, highlighting their struggles, achievements, and the collective consciousness that emerged in response to exploitation and adversity.

Labor history, as explored by historians like E. P. Thompson and Eric Hobsbawm, sought to broaden the understanding of labor’s role in society, emphasizing the significance of the working class’s voice in historical narratives. Their work prompted a shift away from traditional top-down approaches that primarily spotlighted political elites and institutions.

The influence of Marxism during this period pushed for a thorough investigation into the social dynamics shaping the labor movement. This new perspective championed the examination of labor within a broader socio-economic context, recognizing the interplay of various factors such as ideology, culture, and class struggle.

In retrospect, the contributions of these scholars were twofold: while they advanced the field of labor history through innovative methodologies and a focus on “history from below,” they arguably also led to a form of analysis that could be dismissive of alternative perspectives. This methodological rigidity sometimes resulted in a narrow interpretation of evidence that conflicted with Marxist frameworks.

The evolution of labor history reflects broader societal shifts, intertwining academic research with the political climate of the time, particularly during the latter half of the twentieth century. The work of labor historians has since enriched our understanding of the past as it reminds us of the vital role that ordinary workers played in shaping history and society.

Concurrent with these developments, labor history has become a richer field that invites diverse methodologies and perspectives, ultimately fostering a deeper and more inclusive understanding of the struggles and contributions of the working classes throughout history.influential in establishing a fresh agenda for labor historians and emphasizing the significance of labor studies within broader social history. During the 1950s and 1960s, historians began to focus on groups that had been largely overlooked in the past, including women and non-Caucasian ethnic minorities. Some scholars framed their analyses of gender and race using class as a lens; for example, C. L. R. James, a Marxist, examined the experiences of black individuals during the Haitian Revolution. Conversely, others argued that class might not be the primary social category, drawing attention to issues such as racism, patriarchy, and various forms of division and oppression present within the working class.

Labor history continues to revolve around two key areas of interest: the institutional histories of workers’ organizations and the “history from below” perspective associated with Marxist historians.

Despite the considerable impact of Marxists, numerous labor historians chose to distance themselves from the revolutionary implications implied in the works of figures like Thompson and Hobsbawm. By the 1980s, the concept of class as a historical social relationship and explanatory framework began to face widespread scrutiny. A number of distinguished labor historians shifted their focus from Marxism to adopt a postmodernist perspective, highlighting the significance of language and questioning whether class could truly be defined without a corresponding “language of class”. Others emphasized the labor movement’s limitations and moderate tendencies, contending that social progress was more often marked by accommodation, acceptance of existing structures, and cross-class collaboration rather than by conflict and transformative upheaval.

United States

In the United States, labor history is chiefly located within history departments, with some representation in labor unions. The research focuses on the institutional history of labor unions as well as the social history of the workforce. Recent years have seen a particular emphasis on historically marginalized groups, particularly African Americans, women, Hispanics, and Asians. The Study Group on International Labor and Working-Class History was founded in 1971, boasting a membership of approximately 1,000 and publishing International Labor and Working-Class History. H-LABOR, initiated in 1993 as a daily email discussion group, connects over a thousand scholars and graduate students. Additionally, the Labor and Working-Class History Association, established in 1988, produces Labor: Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas.

Key figures in this field include John R. Commons (1862–1945), David Brody (b. 1930), Melvyn Dubofsky, David Montgomery (1927–2011), and Joseph A. McCartin (b. 1959).

United Kingdom

Kirk (2010) examines labor historiography in Britain since the Society for the Study of Labour History was founded in 1960. He notes that labor history has largely been pragmatic, eclectic, and empirical, significantly contributing to historiographical discussions on themes such as history from below, the debate between institutional and social histories of labor, as well as issues of class, populism, gender, language, postmodernism, and political engagement. Kirk counters claims of the field’s decline, emphasizing its continuous innovation and renewal, though he also observes a trend towards conservative insularity and academic focus. He advocates for a deeper and more critical engagement with comparative, transnational, and global approaches that are gaining traction among labor historians worldwide and calls for renewed public and political engagement with these topics. Meanwhile, Navickas (2011) explores contemporary scholarship on collective action, environmental history, human ecology, and gender issues, paying particular attention to the work of scholars like James Epstein, Malcolm Chase, and Peter Jones.

In addition to Marxist perspectives, social historians have also shown considerable interest in labor history.

Addison notes that by the 1990s, labor history in Britain was “in sharp decline,” largely due to:

the waning interest in the history of the white, male working class. Instead, the ‘cultural turn’ encouraged historians to investigate wartime constructions of gender, race, citizenship, and national identity.

Others

Historically, China had a limited industrial base, but the Treaty of Shimonoseki led to the emergence of factories and a new working class within the country.

Appendix

Endnotes

1. 1. Mike Savage and Andrew Miles, The Remaking of the British Working Class, 1840–1940, Routledge, 1994, p. 1.
   2. Kenneth O. Morgan, My Histories (University of Wales Press, 2015) p 85.
   3. Morgan, My Histories (2015) p 86.
   4. Morgan, My Histories (2015), p. 86. online at JSTOR.
   5. E.P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class, Victor Gollancz Ltd., 1963.
   6. Daniel J. Walkowitz and Donna T. Haverty-Stacke, eds. Rethinking U.S. Labor History: Essays on the Working-Class Experience, 1756-2009 (2010)
   7. See ILWCH Website
   8. See H-LABOR website
   9. John Rogers Commons, Myself (1934), his autobiography.
   10. David Brody, “The old labor history and the new: In search of an American working class.” Labor History (1979) 20#1 pp: 111-126.
   11. Melvyn Dubofsky (b. 1934), Hard Work: The Making of Labor History (2000) excerpt
   12. David Montgomery, Workers’ Control in America: Studies in the History of Work, Technology, and Labor Struggles (1980) excerpt
   13. Labor’s Great War: The Struggle for Industrial Democracy and the Origins of Modern American Labor Relations, 1912-21 Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1997; and
   14. Collision Course: Ronald Reagan, the Air Traffic Controllers, and the Strike that Changed America. Oxford University Press, 2011.
   15. Neville Kirk, “Challenge, Crisis, and Renewal? Themes in the Labour History of Britain, 1960–2010,” Labour History Review, August 2010, Vol. 75 Issue 2, pp 162-180.
   16. Katrina Navickas, “What happened to class? New histories of labour and collective action in Britain,” Social History, May 2011, Vol. 36 Issue 2, pp 192-204.
   17. John McIlroy, “Asa Briggs and the Emergence of Labour History in Post-War Britain.” Labour History Review 77.2 (2012): 211-242.
   18. Paul Addison and Harriet Jones, eds. A Companion to Contemporary Britain: 1939-2000 (2005) p. 4.
   19. Shaffer, Lynda (1981). “Modern Chinese Labor History, 1895-1949”. International Labor and Working-Class History. 20 (20): 31–37.

Further Reading:

1. 1. • Allen, Joan, Alan Campbell, Eric Hobsbawm, and John McIlroy. Histories of Labour: National and International Perspectives (2010).
      • Arnesen, Eric. Encyclopedia of U.S. Labor and Working-Class History (3 Vols, 2006).
      • Kirk, Neville. “Challenge, Crisis, and Renewal? Themes in the Labour History of Britain, 1960–2010,” Labour History Review, August 2010, Vol. 75 Issue 2, pp 162–180.
      • Linden, Marcel van der. Transnational Labour History: Explorations (2003).
      • McIlroy, John. “Asa Briggs and the Emergence of Labour History in Post-War Britain.” Labour History Review 77.2 (2012): 211–242.
      • Mapes, Kathleen, and Randi Storch. “The Making and Remaking of a Labor Historian: Interview with James R. Barrett.” Labor: Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas. 13.2 (2016): 63–79.
      • Navickas, Katrina. “What happened to class? New histories of labour and collective action in Britain,” Social History, May 2011, Vol. 36 Issue 2, pp 192–204.
      • Pearson, Chad. “Twentieth Century US Labor History: Pedagogy, Politics, and Controversies Part 1.” History Compass 15.12 (2017): e12433.
      • Price, Richard. “Histories of Labour and Labour History,” Labour History Review, December 2010, Vol. 75 Issue 3, pp 263–270, focusing on Britain.
      • Robert, Jean-Louis, Antoine Prost, and Chris Wrigley, eds. The Emergence of European Trade Unionism (2004).
      • Heerma van Voss, Lex, and Marcel van der Linden, eds. Class and Other Identities: Gender, Religion and Ethnicity in the Writing of European Labor History (Berghahn Books, 2002).
      • Walkowitz, Daniel J., and Donna T. Haverty-Stacke, eds. Rethinking U.S. Labor History: Essays on the Working-Class Experience, 1756-2009 (2010).

This content was originally published by Wikipedia on April 18, 2004, under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Image Source: Everett Collection / Shutterstock