In ancient Rome, doctors produced a vast assortment of pharmaceuticals for addressing health issues. Roman medicine was exceptionally advanced, and significant texts from Roman medical literature outline early antiseptics, narcotics, and anti-inflammatory treatments. Although some of the components utilized by the Romans proved effective, a considerable number of ancient Roman remedies had no efficacy or were harmful, particularly when consumed in inaccurate dosages.
Origin and Meaning
The expression “pharmacy” stems from the Greek word “pharmakon“, which encompassed items and substances that could influence physical health. The overlapping domains of poisons, elixirs, and remedies were all classified as pharmaka. Greek medicine significantly shaped Roman medical practices, which later assimilated medical concepts from other nearby cultures such as Egypt, Pontus, and Gaul. In ancient Latin, medical substances and preparations were referred to as “materia medica“, translating to “medical materials”.
These terms were widely utilized to define medicinal items and preparations, influencing the terminologies in various contemporary languages. The ancient interpretation of pharmaka also embraced mystical objects like amulets and talismans, which formed part of the folkloric medicine practiced in the ancient Mediterranean. Certain common substances could be categorized as pharmaka when employed to promote wellness, such as wine and oil.
Production and Administration of Pharmaceuticals
Botanicals, animal products, and mineral elements were ground and mixed using simple instruments like mortar and pestle. These could then be combined into an almost endless variety of salves, lozenges, tablets, and suppositories. Medicinal concoctions and herbal teas could be consumed or absorbed with pieces of bread. Washes and rinses frequently served to treat wounds and ailments of the ears or eyes. Another prevalent method of delivering medicine involved incinerating ingredients and fumigating bodily orifices with the resulting smoke.
The four primary components of ancient Roman pharmaceuticals were oil, vinegar, wine, and honey. Each ingredient was believed to possess its own medicinal properties, with most medications relying on at least one. Oil, encompassing both vegetable oils and animal fats, purified and moisturized skin. Wine was mainly beneficial for masking the flavors of undesirable components and alleviating patient discomfort. Honey and vinegar would have contributed to infection prevention by destroying bacteria, even though the Romans lacked awareness of this. Vinegar’s acidity endowed it with antiseptic attributes, while honey exhibited antimicrobial qualities.
The other components of Roman treatments encompassed a range of advantageous, neutral, and actively harmful substances. Botanicals and their derivatives constituted the most extensively utilized category of ingredients. Ash and metals, particularly lead and copper oxides, were also frequently utilized. Roman treatments sometimes incorporated blood, feces, urine, insects, and animal tissues. Blistering beetles, which contain the potentially lethal chemical cantharidin, were used to chemically remove warts and ingested to induce erections.
A substantial number of pre-prepared medications were desiccated and formed into cakes, which a physician could then crush for application. Small containers and palettes were also employed for storing medicines and cosmetics. Archaeologists often deploy spectroscopic and DNA analysis to examine the residue of materials found in these containers to discern the components of ancient medications. Nonetheless, it is not always evident whether a substance was intended as a medicinal agent, a cosmetic, or a food additive.
Medicinal Botany
The ancient production of pharmaceuticals necessitated in-depth knowledge of flora. The field of botany – the classification, cultivation, and application of plants – was established thousands of years before the Roman era, but like other realms of Roman science, it lacked precision. Ancient authors often referred to the same plant by numerous names, and botanical terminology evolved over time. Works such as the De Materia Medica by Dioscorides (c. 50-70 CE) and Naturalis
“`Historia (77-79 CE) by Pliny the Elder contributed to the classification of flora and their therapeutic applications, categorizing them based on their characteristics. Medical practitioners such as Galen (129-216 CE) and Celsus (c. 25 BCE to c. 50 CE) also elucidated the therapeutic uses of plants.
The commerce of both therapeutic elements and ready-made pharmaceuticals represented a vast sector in antiquity, necessitating an intricate network of traders and producers. The surge in trade during the imperial era allowed Romans improved access to ingredients that were once considered exotic. Indian black pepper, Ethiopian cumin, and Arabian cinnamon, frankincense, and myrrh circulated throughout the Roman Empire for both medicinal and culinary purposes. Despite the high costs associated with transporting these substances over extensive distances and the fact that many medicinal products were not durable, the majority of the populace still depended on local alternatives.
Wound Care
The evolution of Roman medicine was significantly influenced by Roman warfare, leading to the establishment of a sophisticated suite of treatments for battlefield injuries. Vinegar and other caustic agents utilized in antiquity to sanitize wounds served as moderately effective antiseptics. Common materials such as red ochre and pine resin also exhibited strong antiseptic attributes.
Although managing septic conditions was essential, other treatments aimed to halt bleeding, extract toxins from injuries, and alleviate swelling. Substances like oak gall and spider web were employed to control hemorrhaging, while asphalt, gum, and egg white were utilized to assist in wound closure. Excessive inflammation of wounds was believed to result in more serious health issues, such as gangrene; thus, it was treated with anti-inflammatory poultices and medicated bandages.
In the realm of Greco-Roman medicine, pus was regarded as a natural aspect of the healing process, hence specific medications were utilized to stimulate pus formation. These treatments included materials like boiled wool, pork fat, and pitch fat. The intentional cultivation of beneficial pus-generating bacteria may have had the effect of obstructing detrimental bacteria from infecting the wound. Symptoms of fever around wounds, indicative of infection, did not receive primary attention from ancient physicians and were not treated directly.
Narcotics and Anesthetics
Narcotic substances were extensively applied in antiquity to address chronic pain and sleeplessness. Many of these pharmaceuticals, with the potential to induce unconsciousness or cause fatalities if mismanaged, were also recognized as poisons. Flora containing toxic alkaloids were commonly employed in the formulation of narcotic products. Mandrake was known for its strong narcotic properties capable of inducing a comatose state. Other alkaloidal plants, including hemlock, wolfsbane, henbane, and hellebore, bore similar effects when ingested in large quantities.
Diverse varieties of poppy, each with distinct medical uses, were cultivated in the ancient era. Poppy blossoms were grown specifically to extract their juice for use in the fabrication of medicinal brews or salves. Papaver rhoeas, commonly referred to as the “corn poppy” due to its presence in wheat fields, was one of the most widely cultivated varieties throughout the Roman Empire. Although it lacked the potency of several other poppy types, it was processed into rhoeadine, a remedy utilized by Roman physicians to combat sleeplessness and various ailments.
Anesthetic substances were infrequently administered for pain relief from injuries, and ancient surgical texts describe methods of physically restraining patients instead of sedating them. Although ancient writings extensively address alcohol dependency, the concept of narcotic addiction was not prevalent in ancient Roman society. This can be partially attributed to the fact that narcotics were not readily available, consistently potent, or economical enough to foster widespread addiction. The emperor Marcus Aurelius (r.
161-180 CE), who frequently ingested opium as part of his therapeutic routine, is an exception.
Due to their therapeutic qualities, numerous of these components were linked with love elixirs and sorcery in Roman tradition. Hypnos and Thanatos, the dual embodiments of Sleep and Death respectively, were often portrayed alongside poppies. Hecate, a deity connected to sorcery, was similarly associated with poppy symbolism.
Efficacy
Contemporary scholars view the efficacy of ancient medicine as varied. The fundamental reasons behind illnesses were not well comprehended in ancient times, and medicinal components were frequently chosen based on their symbolic ties to characteristics like warmth, coolness, aridity, or dampness. Medical innovators such as Galen advocated for more evidence-rooted practices developed through direct observation, yet they lacked much of the knowledge that present-day medical experts possess.
Some ancient Roman pharmaceutical solutions may have been genuinely effective. Recent research has shown the efficacy of many ancient medicinal substances. Nevertheless, the majority of ancient “remedies” lack any medical foundation. Beliefs in their efficacy were bolstered by superstition, folklore, and the placebo phenomenon, despite insufficient evidence. Numerous endemic ailments, such as parasitic infections, were almost impossible to treat prior to the advent of modern medicine.
While certain ancient Roman remedies may have contained beneficial active compounds, there was no system of quality assurance overseeing their efficacy. No ancient civilization had established medical standards governing the production and distribution of remedies. The relatively rudimentary techniques for processing ingredients meant that various batches of medicine could demonstrate hazardous fluctuations in strength. Furthermore, there was no guarantee for patients or doctors that medicinal components had not been adulterated with cheaper alternatives by unscrupulous sellers.
Image Source: Lorena Alejandra Ledesma @ Shutterstock
