How do we grasp our surroundings? With time, our brain constructs a pyramid of wisdom, where more advanced concepts are correlated with the fundamental elements that compose them. For example, we learn that cupboards comprise drawers and that Dalmatian dogs feature black-and-white patches, not vice versa. This interconnected structure forms our expectations and perspective of the world, enabling us to identify what we see based on circumstances and familiarity.
“Consider an elephant,” mentions Leopoldo Petreanu, the senior writer of the la Caixa-supported exploration. “The elephant is linked with basic attributes such as hue, dimensions, and mass, as well as more elaborate contexts like forests or savannahs. Establishing links between ideas aids in comprehending the world and deciphering puzzling stimuli. When on a safari, spotting an elephant behind shrubs becomes more probable. Knowing it’s an elephant makes it easier to perceive its grey tone even when the light dims at dusk. But where does this prior knowledge reside in the brain, and how is it gained?”
The Function of Response in Visual Processing
The brain’s visual mechanism comprises a network of regions collaborating, with fundamental regions examining simple specifics (e.g., small spatial zones, hues, boundaries) and advanced regions illustrating more intricate concepts (e.g., extensive spatial regions, creatures, visages). Cells in higher regions transmit “response” connections to lower regions, enabling them to learn and embed genuine connections forged by experience. For instance, cells symbolizing an “elephant” might send responses to cells processing attributes like “grey,” “large,” and “weighty.” The researchers, therefore, embarked on scrutinizing how visual exposure impacts the design of these response projections, of which the working role remains largely enigmatic.
Visual Encounter and Response Associations
“Our objective was to fathom how these response projections stockpile knowledge about the world,” states Rodrigo Dias, one of the primary contributors to the research. “To tackle this, we explored the consequences of visual exposure on response projections to a lower visual realm named V1 in mice. We nurtured two groups of mice differently: one in a standard environment with regular luminance and the other in darkness. We then inspected how the response connections, and the cells they aim for in V1, reacted to diverse locales of the visual domain.”
The Effect of Visual Encounter on Brain Connectivity
In mice nurtured in darkness, both the response connections and V1 cells immediately beneath them manifested identical visual space regions. The lead author, Radhika Rajan, picks up the narrative, “Witnessing the remarkable alignment of spatial designs between higher and lower regions in the mice reared in dimness was astounding. This indicates that the brain possesses an intrinsic, hereditary plan for arranging these spatially synchronized connections, regardless of visual inputs.” Yet, in mice raised in usual conditions, these connections were less accurately synchronized, with more response inputs carrying details from adjacent portions of the visual field.
Rajan further asserts, “Our findings suggested that, through visual exposure, responses furnish additional contextual and fresh data, augmenting V1 cells’ capacity to sample insights from an expanded visual panorama.” This outcome relied on the origin within the higher visual region: response projections from profound strata were prone to delivering peripheral data compared to those from superficial strata.
Adjustment Aided by Experience in Visual Response
Besides, the team unveiled that, in normally-raised mice, profound-layer response input to V1 got structured based on the patterns they “prefer” observing, like vertical or horizontal lines. “For instance,” Dias elaborates, “inputs favoring vertical lines refrained from transmitting peripheral data to regions located along the vertical axis. Conversely, we detected no partiality in connectivity design in dark-raised mice.”
“This implies that visual experience plays a pivotal role in refining response connections and framing the spatial data conveyed from upper to lower visual realms,” emphasizes Petreanu. “We devised a computational outline demonstrating how experience triggers a screening process, diminishing connections between responses and V1 cells with overlapping depictions excessively. This curtails redundancy, authorizing V1 cells to integrate a wider range of responses.”
Significance for Mental Health Conditions
Paradoxically, the brain might encode acquired knowledge by interconnecting cells that delineate incongruent concepts, and that are unlikely to be concurrently activated based on genuine configurations. This could be an energy-efficient strategy to stash information, ensuring that upon encountering a new stimulus, such as a rose-colored elephant, the brain’s prearranged wirings boost activation, refining detection and updating anticipations about the world.
Spotting this brain junction where prior insight merges with fresh sensory data could prove invaluable for formulating interventions in situations where this unification process malfunctions. As Petreanu concludes, “Such imbalances are speculated to occur in conditions like autism and schizophrenia. In autism, individuals may perceive everything as novel due to the paucity of robust prior data to sway perception. Conversely, in schizophrenia, prevailing prior data could overshadow, leading to internally initiated perceptions rather than rooted in actual sensory inputs. Scrutinizing the integration of sensory cues and prior knowledge can contribute to managing these asymmetries.”
Image Source: Kittyfly / Shutterstock
